---
remediation_report: true
remediator_model: claude-opus-4.8
remediated_at: 2026-06-30T14:04:58Z
target_doc: pipeline/03-semantic-check.md
review_report: ../../reviews/pipeline/03-semantic-check.md.review.md
target_doc_source_commit_before: c21ead2690b5b9fa4a582f6b51a4cd5fb34d29d8
target_doc_source_commit_after: c21ead2690b5b9fa4a582f6b51a4cd5fb34d29d8
actions:
  fixed: 0
  rejected_bogus: 1
  rejected_out_of_scope: 0
  deferred: 0
  escalated: 0
---

# Remediation report for pipeline/03-semantic-check.md

## Summary

One finding reviewed; no edit applied. F-001 is rejected as bogus: the target document already satisfies the finding. `## Synthesizing implicit code` (target lines 195-204) attributes the synthesis decisions to `slang-check-decl.cpp` and the AST-building helpers to `slang-ast-synthesis.cpp`, which is precisely the rewording F-001 recommends. The cited symbols were verified against source at HEAD. The target document was not edited, so `target_doc_source_commit_after` equals `target_doc_source_commit_before`.

## Actions

| Finding ID | Action | Rationale | Fix summary |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| F-001 | rejected-bogus | The doc does not credit `slang-ast-synthesis.cpp` with synthesizing witnesses/members as the finding claims. Target lines 195-204 already state the decisions "live primarily in `slang-check-decl.cpp` — for example `_synthesizeCtorSignature` ... and the `trySynthesize*RequirementWitness` routines", while `slang-ast-synthesis.cpp` "supplies the `ASTSynthesizer` helpers ... that build the AST fragments those routines emit". Verified at HEAD: `_synthesizeCtorSignature` at `source/slang/slang-check-decl.cpp:645`; `trySynthesizeMethodRequirementWitness`/`trySynthesizeConstructorRequirementWitness` at `source/slang/slang-check-decl.cpp:7753,8238`; `ASTSynthesizer::emitBinaryExpr/emitVarExpr/emitInvokeExpr/emitVarDeclStmt` at `source/slang/slang-ast-synthesis.cpp:5,60,136,205`. Doc already matches the recommendation; no edit applies. | — |
